Click 'Find in Minutes', then press 'ALT S' to repeatedly search page.


22
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 12, 2005

SOUTHINGTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Public Hearing – Tuesday, April 12, 2005
7:30 pm – Town Hall Council Chambers
75 Main Street, Southington, Connecticut

MINUTES

CHAIRMAN JOSEPH LaPORTE, called the public hearing portion of the Regular Meeting to order at 7:31 o’clock, p.m., with the following in attendance:

Mr. Salka, Mr. Kalkowski, Mr. Sherman and Mr. Kuklinski
Mr. Vinci, Zoning Enforcement Officer, sat in Mr. Bohigian, Alternate

A quorum was determined.

The Pledge of Allegiance to the American Flag was recited by everyone in attendance.


Mr. Sherman explained the procedure to be followed in the presentation of an appeal and advised them that should their appeal be approved, they file it with the Town Clerk’s Office as soon as possible. Also, it is necessary to have four affirmative votes to approve an appeal.


JOSEPH LaPORTE, Chairman, presiding:

MR. VINCI: Mr. Chairman, before reading this first application, Item E on our Agenda, Appeal 5304, application of Goldroc II, LLC. I went out there Tuesday of last week and the sign was not posted.

I contacted the Attorney and he said he had given the sign to the applicant, but apparently it didn’t get posted. The sign did get apparently put up on Wednesday. But it didn’t meet our ten-day period.

I suggest that we table this to the next meeting.

THE CHAIR: We’ll table this to the next meeting.

MR. VINCI: Is there anybody here for Goldrock Café?

(No response)

THE CHAIR: Okay, we’ll table it.




APPEAL #5300A, application of TRSCO, LLC d/b/a 25 Center Street Restaurant for Special Exception Approval to allow applicant to serve alcoholic beverages in connection with an outdoor dining permit, under Section 4-01.32A, 11-04 and 15-05 of the Zoning Regulations, 25 Center Street, property of Simone Del Buono and Martin Toma, 125 feet west of the intersection with North Main Street, in a CB zone.

MR. VINCI: Will the applicant please state your name and address for the record?

TOM SHARPE: Business address, 25 Center Street, Southington, Connecticut.

All we’re looking for is just to essentially renew what we had last year, which was the full availability of food and beverage outside on the sidewalk.

I’ve already got the dining permit. I understand now that is going to be continuous until a change of ownership.

I don’t know if you guys are considering that? We were just talking about that. I don’t know if this is going to be continuous, but essentially for right now, we’re looking to have food and beverage outside the restaurant.

THE CHAIR: Okay, if the Board did like approve this here, it’s for one year, only.

MR. VINCI: That’s what we did last time. The Council apparently has waived that requirement provided that the applicant remains in good standing. So, our approval is for one year. We could add that however, I wrote something down, however, upon receipt of a letter of request after the first of the following year, the Board may waive this requirement for that year. So, after this year is over, before next season starts, if they send a letter, I’ll get the Board’s permission that they remained in good standing and we could just waive that requirement for them coming back.

THE CHAIR: And, they wouldn’t have to come back.

MR. VINCI: So, we could add that to the first stipulation.

THE CHAIR: And, there would be no public address system.

And, alcohol to be served in glasses and not in bottles. Is that the way we’re doing it?

MR. SHARPE: That’s how they were, yes.

MR. SHERMAN: That’s a stipulation.

MR. KALKOWSKI: Is this the same floor plan that you had, identical to last year?

MR. SHARPE: Yes, sir. I believe I gave Frank a bunch of copies for you this year, as well. It’s the same as last year.

THE CHAIR: In other words, you’ve got to comply with the Town regulations.

MR. SHARPE: Exactly.

THE CHAIR: Any more questions?

(No response)

Have you finished your presentation?

MR. SHARPE: Yes, sir. Do you have enough copies? I have some extras.

MR. VINCI: We’re all set.

THE CHAIR: Anyone to speak in favor of the applicant?

(No response)

Anyone opposing the applicant?

(No response)

If not, this appeal is closed.



APPEAL #5301A, application of Barry J. DePaolo for Special Exception Approval to allow applicant to serve alcoholic beverages in connection with an outdoor dining permit. Under Section 4-01.32A, 11-04 and 15-05 of the Zoning Regulations, 30 Center Street, property of CJBJ Realty, LLC, 150 feet west of the intersection with North Main Street, in a CB zone.

MR. VINCI: Will the applicant please state your name and address for the record?

BARRY J. DEPAOLO: 30 Center Street, Southington. Basically, the same application Tom just gave you. We’re looking for the one, to redo our application from last year.

Nothing’s changed. The configuration is the exact same thing as last year with the same requirements, meeting all the Town requirements.

THE CHAIR: You have to comply with the Town regulations.

MR. DEPAOLO: Yes.

MR. VINCI: Did you want to add the same stipulation?

EVERYONE: Yes, yes.

MR. KALKOWSKI: Let’s bring them in line.

MR. VINCI: Okay.

THE CHAIR: Have you finished your presentation?

MR. DEPAOLO: Yes, thank you.

THE CHAIR: Anyone to speak in favor of the applicant?

(No response)

Anyone opposing the applicant?

(No response)

If not, this appeal is closed.



APPEAL #5302A, application of Michael A. and Laura P. DiMasso to vary the side yard setback to 16.2 feet where 20 feet is required to add a level to an existing one story dwelling and to vary the 40 foot front yard setback to 36.1 feet for a proposed front porch addition, under Section 7A-00 and 11-05.1 of the Zoning Regulations, 53 Sandra Lane, property of Michael A. and Laura P. DiMasso, opposite the intersection with Eastwood Drive, in an R-20/25 zone.

MR. VINCI: Will the applicant please state your name and address for the record?

MS. DIMASSO: Michael and Laura DiMasso, 53 Sandra Lane, Plantsville.

THE CHAIR: You can explain.

MS. DIMASSO: Our house is currently a ranch style home with the septic system directly behind the back of the house, which makes it impossible for us to go out. So, we wanted to put on a second floor addition.

The need for the variance in the front of the house is to accommodate like a little entryway for the staircase, to make the staircase fall at the bearing wall, at the midpoint of the house.

I think you guys have a copy.

THE CHAIR: This is a nonconforming lot as it is right now? This is nonconforming.

(Pause)

MR. SALKA: The houses were built in ’68.

MR. VINCI: Is there a septic system here?

MS. DIMASSO: Yes.

MR. VINCI: Yes. This is nonconforming.

MR. DIMASSO: I think you guys have a copy of the plot that shows where the septic is relationship to the house.

THE CHAIR: Now, you are talking about an addition, right? Now you’re talking about the main house and not the garage?

MS. DIMASSO: Not the garage. Just the main house.

MR. SHERMAN: Excuse me. Could you move the microphone around so the record gets all the wisdom?

MS. DIMASSO: Sure.

MR. SHERMAN: Thank you.

MS. DIMASSO: Better?

And, the reason for the request of the variance on that side of the house is because we’re putting on a second floor essentially to make the house into a colonial as opposed to a ranch. And, that is where the end of the house is now. We’re not going further than where the end of the house is now. It’s just so it can be directly on top of the existing house.

THE CHAIR: I have to ask you something now. Do you have a business running out of that house or anything? Do you have a restraining order on anything? Do you have anything?

MS. DIMASSO: No. We have an office and stuff now.

MR. DIMASSO: No.

MS. DIMASSO: We had moved everything out of the house.

MR. VINCI: Mr. Chairman, I have noticed that there’s been a couple of pick up trucks out there with business writing on the side.

MR. DIMASSO: That’s my truck.

MS. DIMASSO: That’s my husband’s truck.

MR. VINCI: Well, you’re not allowed two commercial vehicles.

MR. DIMASSO: I don’t have two commercial vehicles. One.

MR. VINCI: Well, if you have business writing on them --- you are apparently using them for a commercial purpose.

MR. DIMASSO: Only one, my truck is a commercial vehicle. The other one is listed as combination. And, it’s not lettered.

MR. VINCI: Okay. You’re allowed one commercial vehicle not in excess of one ton. Please be aware of that.

Also, I think you have a boat on the side of the house? You have to move it to behind the house, five feet from the property line.

MS. DIMASSO: Okay. Actually, we can move that to his garage. It’s not a problem.

MR. VINCI: You can have it there. It just has to be a little bit farther back, five feet off the property line.

MS. DIMASSO: Okay.

THE CHAIR: You can continue.

(Pause)

Are you all done with your presentation?

MS. DIMASSO: I think so.

MR. VINCI: Do you have any kind of drawings or anything that we could look at for this?

MS. DIMASSO: You guys have them all. You have copies of prints. I have another copy if you’d like to look at them.

MR. SALKA: I don’t think I have that.

MR. KALKOWSKI: Rendering of the addition?

MS. DIMASSO: Oh, I’m sorry.

MR. VINCI: What’s the building going to look like?

(Pause, pause)

MS. DIMASSO: I think the second page actually shows what it will look like.

THE CHAIR: This is huge, compared to the layout of the garage. Wow!

(Undertone comments)

FROM THE AUDIENCE: Could I ask a question?

MR. VINCI: Not yet.

If you want to go out and take a closer look, we can always table it.

MR. SHERMAN: Yes, I was going to say, that’s ----

(Pause, pause)

MR. SALKA: Is that the first time, it’s the first time we’ve seen the drawings, right?

THE CHAIR: Yes.

MR. SHERMAN: Mr. Chairman, I move that we table it, keep the public hearing open.

MR. KALKOWSKI: Right.

THE CHAIR: We’re going to table it until next time, okay? It gives us a chance to absorb, especially the print there.

MS. DIMASSO: Okay.

THE CHAIR: So, we’re just going to table it.

MR. VINCI: Continue the public hearing to the next meeting in two weeks.

MS. DIMASSO: Can you give me that date?

MR. VINCI: The 26th, April 26th. Two weeks from today.

MS. DIMASSO: Okay.

MR. SALKA: Can we get copies of those, Frank, those drawings?

MR. VINCI: Yes. Can you provide some copies of those prints?

MR. SALKA: The reason we are tabling it is so we can review the drawings. Because again that, house, when you look at the street, that house is going to be much bigger than the house on the right or the left. We’re just trying to get an idea of what it really is. So, if we can get copies of it, we’d really appreciate it.

MS. DIMASSO: Okay.

MR. VINCI: If possible, get them to me.

MS. DIMASSO: Okay.

MR. SALKA: We have someone here that’s, can we or can they speak instead of making her come back?

THE CHAIR: We’ll let her speak.

MR. VINCI: Ma’m, do you want to come up?

THE CHAIR: You can come up.

JACQUELINE PISSELLE: I live at 63 Sandra Lane. I live next door to Laura and Mike. And, this is the first that I’m hearing of it other than seeing the sign in front of the house about a variance.

So, the only thing I was concerned about is that you can --- you know, I think people should be allowed to create the house that they’d like to live in. If it’s too small, it should be bigger for them. But I also think it should fit the neighborhood.

And, if this second level is going to fit over the first level, isn’t there going to be an overhang if you’re asking for a variance of 20 feet to 16 feet?

THE CHAIR: What I think you’re looking at, you’re saying it probably would be overpowering to the neighborhood.

MS. PISSELLE: Yes. And, I had an addition put on to my house. A one room, family room, gathering room in the back of the house. And, the Town had me move my septic system. It’s not impossible to move the septic system. I grant you it’s going to cost a little bit more, but if you need to move in another direction to get all of the room you want, you can move the septic system.

So, that’s all that I have to say.

THE CHAIR: Okay, thank you.

MR. VINCI: Have you seen the plans of what they want to do?

MS. PISSELLE: No.

MR. VINCI: Well, maybe your neighbors will show the plans to you before ---

MR. PISSELLE: It would’ve been nice a couple of weeks ago.

MR. VINCI: They are indicating they will do that.

THE CHAIR: Okay, thank you.

MR. VINCI: That’s continued to the next meeting.


APPEAL #5303A, application of Ernest and Darlene P. Garlington for a variance to construct a two story garage addition where a story and a half is allowed, under Section 2-07G and 15-04 of the zoning Regulations, 111 Old Mountain Road, property of Ernest and Darlene Powell Garlington, 400 feet south of the intersection with School Street, in an R-80 zone.

MR. VINCI: Will the applicant please state your name and address for the record?

ERNEST GARLINGTON: Hello, my name is Ernest Garlington and I live at 111 Old Mountain Road in Marion.

DARLENE GARLINGTON: I’m his better half, Darlene Garlington.

THE CHAIR: Go ahead and explain.

MR. GARLINGTON: We would like to construct a second level because we decided that we would like to --- we turned our old garage into a library. And, the reason is because my mother and father in law come up a lot. We’re thinking that at one time --- they’ve been married 50 years now, and we think at one time they may end up living with us some time in the future.

But when they do come, they come and they stay in our current family room. They kind of crash on the couch and they take that spot for their living space.

So, we would like to create a living space on top of the garage area that we’re adding on.

MS. GARLINGTON: For the aesthetics.

MR. GARLINGTON: Also, the main reason that we want to add or one of the main reasons we want to add a second level is the way the land is structured, we had to take out a lot of ledge to put it there. There was no other area that we could put it in other than that side area over there because of the amount of ledge around the house.

And, if you actually only do one level or a level and a half, the aesthetics of the home would look very strange because the hillside goes up on an angle. And, the way it’s structured, and I hope I’m clear here, if you do just one level, you would only see the roof of the actual garage from the street. So, you would look at the house and you would see from the side of it, this roof. Without the second level to show that there’s an additional space there, it would just look very strange from the road.

THE CHAIR: Excuse me. Just for the Board here, I was up there and I took a good look at this house. And, it’s like a quarry you do have back there.

MR. GARLINGTON: Yes.

THE CHAIR: I mean, he had a tough time just ---

MR. SALKA: Do we have drawings, Frank?

MR. VINCI: I have a set of plans here.

THE CHAIR: Okay. And, I do agree with you as far as that goes.

MS. GARLINGTON: Thank you very much. I also think it’ll just look more pleasing to the neighborhood because it won’t look like an addition. It’ll look like it was an already existing structure rather than looking like something that was kind of added on.

MR. VINCI: I have one set of plans here that I kind of confiscated from the building department.

That’s the addition there.

THE CHAIR: And, the neighbors are like 100 plus feet away from this house on both sides.

MR. SALKA: Okay. And, its conformity with the size of the house, as well.

THE CHAIR: Oh, yes.

MS. GARLINGTON: Yes.

MR. VINCI: I have a partial picture of the house itself when I took the ZBA sign. Not much.

(Pause, pause)

This is the opposite side of the house here. You can see it is a large home.

There’s that side and this would be right there (indicating). This is where the addition would go.

THE CHAIR: That’s an R-80, too, Frank, right, up there.

MR. VINCI: It’s R-80.

(Pause, pause)

THE CHAIR: So, what he’s adding on there, too, it’s like there is almost 700 sf, am I right, of living space that would be?

MR. GARLINGTON: Yes, just on top.

MR. VINCI: Family room, proposed family room.

MR. SALKA: There is no outside access, Frank, or entrance?

MR. VINCI: No. The entrance is right on the side of the addition, closest to the house.

MR. SALKA: Okay.

THE CHAIR: Do you have any more to add?

MR. GARLINGTON: No.

THE CHAIR: Have you finished your presentation then?

MR. GARLINGTON: Yes.

THE CHAIR: Okay. Anyone here to speak in favor of the applicant?

(No response)

Anyone here opposing the applicant?

ATTORNEY BARBIERI: We oppose.

THE CHAIR: Okay.

ATTORNEY BARBIERI: Good evening, my name is Attorney John Barbieri and I’m from New Britain. And, I represent Kim Zanavich who owns the property I believe it’s just north of this Garlington property.

He spoke about the contour of the land and that is our main concern. Mr. and Mrs. Garlington have already changed their property substantially which is resulting in damage to our property, my client’s property. Mostly by runoff from the water coming from their property.

I’d like to say to this Board and it’s a belief that I have because I have talked to people in the zoning department, that they have already converted the garage into a living quarters. The original garage was on the other side of the house. They have already converted that garage into living quarters or a library, as he likes to say. I don’t believe they obtained a permit for doing that.

MR. GARLINGTON: I have a permit.

THE CHAIR: Oh, they would have to.

MR. GARLINGTON: I have one.

THE CHAIR: They would definitely have to have a permit.

MR. VINCI: I don’t think there was a permit at the time the change was made, but I think he has a permit now.

ATTORNEY BARBIERI: That’s what I’m saying.

MR. VINCI: I know the building official was out there last week.

ATTORNEY BARBIERI: That’s what I’m saying. He went and did the work without getting a permit.

And, this again is a belief that he or that they either added a porch or added on to a porch in the back of the house. I don’t believe there was a permit issued for that at the time they did it. They may have one now but they didn’t have it at the time because I talked with the zoning people a couple of weeks ago and we checked the files and I didn’t see a permit in there.

MS. GARLINGTON: We don’t have a porch, an added porch.

MR. SALKA: Let him finish and then you can rebut.

THE CHAIR: You’ll get a chance after.

ATTORNEY BARBIERI: I’m sorry you were late. You would have heard the instructions at the beginning.

MS. GARLINGTON: I’m sorry.

ATTORNEY BARBIERI: As I said, the main concern, our main concern is the runoff. In order for them to put the garage where they want to put it, they’re going to have to build a driveway up the hill in front of their house and around which is going to mean quite a bit of pavement. Now, that may be perfectly all right, except that we already have runoff on our property.

There is a pipe that someone put in when the house was built or subsequent to the time the house was built that empties water on to my client’s property now. There is a drainage problem that’s causing us problems at the present time.

THE CHAIR: Excuse me just for a minute. A lot of this is the engineering that would take care of this if they did get or go for a permit to build this addition, okay?

ATTORNEY BARBIERI: I would just like the Board to know the problems that we’re having. I understand that most of it is not your concern or not for you to decide. But this is an ongoing problem that we’ve had for a couple of years and we want the Zoning Board to know about it.

Thank you.

MR. SHERMAN: Mr. Chairman, our only part of this is just the second floor on a -- a half floor addition, actually. Not the garage itself.

ATTORNEY BARBIERI: I understand.

THE CHAIR: That’s right.

Anyone here to oppose the applicant?

MATT HUNTING: Good evening. I live next door to the Garlingtons at 105 Old Mountain Road. And, I would just like to have Mr. Garlington move the pipe he ha buried on my property before this appeal is granted. He has buried a drainage pipe on my property and it discharges water on my property and I would like to have this removed before this appeal is granted before we could go on any further.

THE CHAIR: We could stipulate that if we had ---

MR. VINCI: Well, I ---

MR. KALKOWSKI: That’s not ours.

MR. SHERMAN: It’s out of our ---

MR. VINCI: This is a civil matter and I don’t think we should get into it.

EVERYONE: Right.

THE CHAIR: Okay. So, that’s it?

Anyone else here opposing the applicant?

(No response)

Do you want to rebut anything they said? You could come up to the podium and you could rebut it.


MS. GARLINGTON: I just need to say this. I know this has no relevancy here in a way, but as a Christian, I think this is appalling.

MR. SHERMAN: Let me just add to you that you don’t have to answer any of the claims that have nothing to do with our Board because we’re only here for that half of story on the garage.

MS. GARLINGTON: You’re right. I just wand, and then I’m going to sit down, I just want you to know that somebody has shot out the materials on our yard, in our back window. We don’t live in the 1930’s or 40’s. This is really reprehensible. But thank you guys, because you’re wonderful.

THE CHAIR: Okay.

MR. GARLINGTON: I mean, I don’t need, two of our windows shattered and I have to pay thousands of dollars for this.

THE CHAIR: Okay.

Anyone else to speak against?

(No response)

If not, this appeal is closed.





APPEAL #5304A, application of Goldroc II, LLC, for Special Exception Approval to allow applicant to apply for a restaurant liquor license, under Section 4-03.32A, 11-04 and 15-05 of the Zoning Regulations, 461 Queen Street, property of Red Rock II, LLC, at the intersection with Laning Street, in a B zone.

Tabled previously in the meeting.


Continued Public Hearing Items:

APPEAL #5282A, application of Barsin Products, Inc., to vary front yard and side yard setback requirements to 21.4 and 10.5 feet respectively where 40 and 15 feet are required for a proposed home, under Section 7A-00 of the Zoning Regulations, Gwen Road (Assessor’s Map 003, Parcel 037) property of James P and Maria R Santoni, at the intersection with Johnson Avenue, in an R-12 zone.

MR. VINCI: Is there anyone here for Appeal 5282A, Barsin Products?

(No response)

Mr. Chairman, I have a letter from the last meeting, which I didn’t get because it was stuck in the engineering department’s fax machine prior to our last meeting.

I talked to the Attorney, Michael Laden, who represented the applicant. And, the letter requested that he withdraw the application, the last application and he would come back if it is his desire to go forward with it again.

So, this last application, 5282, has been withdrawn.

THE CHAIR: Okay.


7:55 pm


SOUTHINGTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Tuesday, April 12, 2005
Town Hall Council Chambers
75 Main Street, Southington, Connecticut

MINUTES

CHAIRMAN JOSEPH LaPORTE, called the Regular Meeting to order at 7:55 o’clock, p.m., with the following in attendance:

Mr. Salka, Mr. Kalkowski, Mr. Sherman and Mr. Kuklinski
Mr. Vinci, Zoning Enforcement Officer, sat in Mr. Bohigian, Alternate

A quorum was determined.


JOSEPH LaPORTE, Chairman, presiding:


Approval of Minutes - Meeting of March 22, 2005

Mr. Kalkowski made a motion to approve the Minutes of the last week, March 22, 2005. Mr. Sherman seconded. (Motion passed unanimously on a voice vote.)




APPEAL #5300A, application of TRSCO, LLC d/b/a 25 Center Street Restaurant for Special Exception Approval to allow applicant to serve alcoholic beverages in connection with an outdoor dining permit, under Section 4-01.32A, 11-04 and 15-05 of the Zoning Regulations, 25 Center Street, property of Simone Del Buono and Martin Toma, 125 feet west of the intersection with North Main Street, in a CB zone.

Mr. Salka made a motion to approve 5300A with the stipulation that this appeal is good for one year, however upon receiving a written request after the first of the following year, the Board may waive the requirement for that year if it finds the applicant has remained in good standing. And, with the additional conditions that no public address system will be used and alcohol will be served in glasses and not in bottles.

Mr. Sherman seconded.

(Motion passed 5 to 0 on a roll call vote.)



APPEAL #5301A, application of Barry J. DePaolo for Special Exception Approval to allow applicant to serve alcoholic beverages in connection with an outdoor dining permit. Under Section 4-01.32A, 11-04 and 15-05 of the Zoning Regulations, 30 Center Street, property of CJBJ Realty, LLC, 150 feet west of the intersection with North Main Street, in a CB zone.

Mr. Salka made a motion to approve 5300A with the stipulation that this appeal is good for one year, however upon receiving a written request after the first of the following year, the Board may waive the requirement for that year if it finds the applicant has remained in good standing. And, with the additional conditions that no public address system will be used and alcohol will be served in glasses and not in bottles.

Mr. Kalkowski seconded.

(Motion passed 5 to 0 on a roll call vote.)




APPEAL #5302A, application of Michael A. and Laura P. DiMasso to vary the side yard setback to 16.2 feet where 20 feet is required to add a level to an existing one story dwelling and to vary the 40 foot front yard setback to 36.1 feet for a proposed front porch addition, under Section 7A-00 and 11-05.1 of the Zoning Regulations, 53 Sandra Lane, property of Michael A. and Laura P. DiMasso, opposite the intersection with Eastwood Drive, in an R-20/25 zone.

Public Hearing Continued during the public hearing portion of the meeting.





APPEAL #5303A, application of Ernest and Darlene P. Garlington for a variance to construct a two story garage addition where a story and a half is allowed, under Section 2-07G and 15-04 of the zoning Regulations, 111 Old Mountain Road, property of Ernest and Darlene Powell Garlington, 400 feet south of the intersection with School Street, in an R-80 zone.

Mr. Salka made a motion to approve Appeal 5303A. Mr. Kalkowski seconded.

Mr. Salka said basically all the discussion that was had was really not pertinent to this particular application. What he’s asking for is a half a story on an exiting footprint that is not going to affect the runoff one way or the other.

Mr. Vinci interjected it is not an existing footprint. He’s adding. There is an addition.

Mr. Salka added that the hardship is basically the contour of the property and the ledge in the back.

Mr. Sherman noticed the house is large enough to absorb it.

The Chair did say it is an R-80 zone, so he has plenty of room.

Mr. Kalkowski added that it would help the aesthetics.

(Motion passed 5 to 0 on a roll call vote.)






APPEAL #5304A, application of Goldroc II, LLC, for Special Exception Approval to allow applicant to apply for a restaurant liquor license, under Section 4-03.32A, 11-04 and 15-05 of the Zoning Regulations, 461 Queen Street, property of Red Rock II, LLC, at the intersection with Laning Street, in a B zone.

Tabled during the public hearing portion of the meeting.





APPEAL #5282A, application of Barsin Products, Inc., to vary front yard and side yard setback requirements to 21.4 and 10.5 feet respectively where 40 and 15 feet are required for a proposed home, under Section 7A-00 of the Zoning Regulations, Gwen Road (Assessor’s Map 003, Parcel 037) property of James P and Maria R Santoni, at the intersection with Johnson Avenue, in an R-12 zone.

Withdrawn.

Miscellaneous / Old Business / New Business


None


(Whereupon a motion and a second which passed unanimously, the meeting was adjourned at 7:59 o’clock, p.m.)



Joseph LaPorte, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals